Colton Smith vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 11:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Smith vs E. Nava

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Nava
They have played 3 sets in total, with Colton Smith winning 2 and Emilio Nava winning 1. The last match between Colton Smith and Emilio Nava was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 19-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Colton Smith getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Smith | 1 |
| Nava | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Nottingham 2 Challenger(06-19-25)
C. Smith vs E. Nava H2H Profile
C. Smith vs E. Nava Match Preview:
- Smith's recent second serve points won stand at 44.78%, slightly below Nava's 46.45%. Could this give Nava a slight edge?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Nava is ahead with 47.42% compared to Smith's 42.28%. Does this indicate a stronger return game?
- For first serve returns, Smith holds an edge at 27.24% while Nava is slightly lower at 24.78%.
- Under pressure, Smith has been more resilient, saving 55.31% of breakpoints versus Nava's 53.35%.
- In terms of match wins over the last year, Smith leads with a 74.63% success rate, surpassing Nava's 61.9%.
- Smith's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate, while Nava performs best on clay with a win rate of 67%.
- Both players have similar success rates in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Nava slightly edging out Smith.
- A comparison of opponent quality shows Smith facing tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 200.55, as opposed to Nava's 268.71.
- In deciding sets, Smith shows dominance, winning 76% versus Nava's 54% success rate.
- Smith's breakpoint conversion stands at 27.78%, while Nava converts 34.89% of his opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing analysis, with both players showcasing distinct advantages. Nava excels slightly in second serve effectiveness and has a stronger percentage in converting breakpoints.
However, Smith demonstrates a notable ability to perform under pressure, with a higher breakpoint save rate and a significant advantage in deciding set victories. Additionally, Smith's overall win rate over the past year and performances against higher-ranked opponents stand out.
Considering all factors, Smith's resilience and superior record against tougher competition position him as the likely winner in this match. Despite Nava's slight statistical edges in specific areas, Smith’s consistent performance under pressure is expected to tip the scales in his favor.
Colton Smith vs Emilio Nava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Smith vs E. Nava H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:25:17 | Average Match Time | 2:25:17 |
| 64% (69/107) | 1st Serve % | 60% (59/98) |
| 71% (49/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (46/59) |
| 55% (21/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (15/39) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 38% (37/98) | Return Points Win % | 35% (37/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Smith Recent Matches Played
E. Nava Recent Matches Played

C. Smith vs E. Nava Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.36% (71/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.71% (243/164) |
| 60.16% (151/100) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.65% (541/414) |
| 54.93% (1320/1083) | Games Win/Loss | 51.84% (4854/4509) |
| 66.10% (39/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.43% (97/78) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.86% (113/56) |
| 67.86% (19/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 474 | Aces Total | 2493 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 222 | Total Double Faults | 1172 |
| 1:34:57 | Average Match Time | 1:37:23 |
| 293.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.77 |
| 65% (4512/6906) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17701/28308) |
| 70% (3137/4512) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12630/17701) |
| 54% (1283/2394) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5429/10607) |
| 43% (304/699) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1033/2495) |
| 41% (2922/7192) | Return Points Win % | 38% (10695/28348) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (14/14) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Main Tour W/L | 42.31% (11/15) |
| 63.27% (31/18) | Challenger W/L | 61.90% (156/96) |
| 77.14% (27/8) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (48/26) |
| 65% (68/104) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (237/395) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 31% (11/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (87/174) |
| 68% (28/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (77/130) |
| 90% (63/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (231/198) |
| 6% (63/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (231/33) |
| 26% (43/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (176/44) |